Обрадую вас еще раз :)
WPF, похоже, не существует тоже:
WPF has no investment, it’s kept together by a skeleton crew and its evangelism / community efforts have little to no funding attached to it. It’s dead, the question now is how is the corpse going to be buried and no amount of cheer leading will change that outcome in the near future.
И еще:
Evernote 4 is a major departure from Evernote 3.5 in every way. While 3.5 added tons of great new features, there were some problems we simply couldn’t fix: the blurry fonts, slow startup times, large memory footprint, and poor support for certain graphics cards were all issues that the technology behind 3.5 (Windows .net and WPF) was incapable of resolving. As a result, we ended up chasing down platform bugs rather than adding the great features our users wanted.
So we decided to start over from scratch, with fast, native C++ that we knew we could rely on. ...
On our test hardware, Evernote 4 starts five times faster, and uses half the memory of Evernote 3.5.
WPF has no investment, it’s kept together by a skeleton crew and its evangelism / community efforts have little to no funding attached to it. It’s dead, the question now is how is the corpse going to be buried and no amount of cheer leading will change that outcome in the near future.
И еще:
Evernote 4 is a major departure from Evernote 3.5 in every way. While 3.5 added tons of great new features, there were some problems we simply couldn’t fix: the blurry fonts, slow startup times, large memory footprint, and poor support for certain graphics cards were all issues that the technology behind 3.5 (Windows .net and WPF) was incapable of resolving. As a result, we ended up chasing down platform bugs rather than adding the great features our users wanted.
So we decided to start over from scratch, with fast, native C++ that we knew we could rely on. ...
On our test hardware, Evernote 4 starts five times faster, and uses half the memory of Evernote 3.5.
no subject
Qt - хреново, так как зависит от Нокии и непонятных разработчиков, WPF хренов так как его не будут развивать. я вот стесняюсь спросить, может вы и WinAPI пользоваться боитесь, так как оно тоже последние лет 10 активно не развивается? :)
в нормальных конторах используют и то и другое и не парятся если это что-то умрет через год. ну перепишут гуй на другом чем-то, гуй это всего лишь гуй. вот с тем кодом что под гуем (в плане выбора языка) - сложнее
no subject
А вот как только начинается вопрос "показать пользователю удобный GUI" все, кроме дельфи и WinAPI, встает раком сразу же. Ну или требует совершенно немыслимых усилий по разработке.
Поэтому 90% вменяемых разработчиков на вопрос "на чем вы пишете GUI" отвечают "
я табак не курюя гуи не пишу, у нас есть 10 студентов, которые любую заданную форму нарисуют в дизайнере хоть Oracle Forms, хоть SAP R/3, им пофиг".no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Который появился за 15 лет до веба.
no subject